Nature Versus Nurture Effects on Child Development

Nature Versus Nurture Effects on Child Development Introduction The nature versus nurture controversy can be perceived as the roles played by heredity or inheritance as well as the environment in the development of human beings. The behavior of human beings is thus attributed to genetic predisposition, a phenomenon commonly referred to as the nature theory of human behavior (Keltner, James, Darling, Findley Oliver, 2001).Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on â€Å"Nature† Versus â€Å"Nurture†: Effects on Child Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The nurture theory attributable to human behavior can be defined as the innate personal experiences which make people behave in a certain way as they have been taught to behave. However, nature and nurture theorems have been the center of focus by many studies which major in the field of human psychology. The following essay will focus on the controversy of â€Å"nature† versus â€Å"nur ture† and how it affects our understanding of child development. Children development Keltner et.al argues that some behaviors are hereditary and thus are inborn while others are attributed to environmental effects (Keltner et.al, 2001). On one hand, the mind of a child can be considered as a blank slate at the beginning of his/her development and is then shaped by the environment around the child. On the other hand, it can be argued that the behavior of a child is inborn and thus hereditary. As such, there is no clear explanation of what really influences a child’s behavior. For instance, academic excellence is sometimes attributed to genetics and the level of education of the child’s parents. However, environmental factors also make a large contribution on the child’s academic success. For instance, a child born of a rich family stands a high chance of receiving quality education compared to on e born of a poor family. Additionally, a child born of intel ligent parents might also perform poorly should he/she be educated in a school with poor quality of education. Although psychologists agree that the two controversies have some influence in the development of a child, many are hesitant to buy the extremes of these arguments. This is due to the fact that there are various other factors that affect children’s development today.Advertising Looking for critical writing on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More As such, the extent to which nature and nurture affect children’s development is thus considered as the point of focus in the debate. Both factors are believed to interact in various different ways thus, none can be said to be the ultimate influence of a child’s behavior (Dehaene-Lambertz, Hertz-Pannier Dubois, 2006). While the genetic composition can be said to influence the behavior of an individual, it does not always compel someo ne to behave in a certain manner. This implies that an individual is solely responsible for his/her choice of behavior as one grows up. Consequently, a child’s behavior cannot be viewed as solely attributable to the genetic composition of the parents and the hereditary characteristics. For instance, identical twins have been observed to develop different behavior aspects when exposed to different environments. As proposed by the nature theory, there should be no observable difference in their behavior as they have the same genetic composition (Dehaene-Lambertz, Hertz-Pannier Dubois, 2006). Therefore, hereditary genes can only have an effect to a child’s behavior only to some extent. Conclusion From the above argument, the behavior of children during their development cannot be narrowed down to either as a result of â€Å"nature† alone or â€Å"nurture† but rather, as a result of the two factors. Therefore, the society should not generalize the behaviors of children and attribute them to their genetic composition or the environment in which they have been brought up. With these considerations in mind, the development of a child can therefore be based on both hereditary characteristics as well as the environmental effects. References Dehaene-Lambertz, G. Hertz-Pannier, L. Dubois, (2006). Nature and nurture in language acquisition: Anatomical and functional brain-imaging studies in infants. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(7), 367-363. Keltner, N. L., James, C. A., Darling, R. J., Findley, L. S., Oliver, K. (2001). Nature vs. Nurture: Two Brothers With Schizophrenia. Perspectives In Psychiatric Care, 37(3), 88-94. Marotz, L.R., Allen, K.E. (2013). Developmental Profiles: Pre-Birth through adolescence (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on â€Å"Nature† Versus â€Å"Nurture†: Effects on Child Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More

Nature Versus Nurture Effects on Child Development

Nature Versus Nurture Effects on Child Development Introduction The nature versus nurture controversy can be perceived as the roles played by heredity or inheritance as well as the environment in the development of human beings. The behavior of human beings is thus attributed to genetic predisposition, a phenomenon commonly referred to as the nature theory of human behavior (Keltner, James, Darling, Findley Oliver, 2001).Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on â€Å"Nature† Versus â€Å"Nurture†: Effects on Child Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The nurture theory attributable to human behavior can be defined as the innate personal experiences which make people behave in a certain way as they have been taught to behave. However, nature and nurture theorems have been the center of focus by many studies which major in the field of human psychology. The following essay will focus on the controversy of â€Å"nature† versus â€Å"nur ture† and how it affects our understanding of child development. Children development Keltner et.al argues that some behaviors are hereditary and thus are inborn while others are attributed to environmental effects (Keltner et.al, 2001). On one hand, the mind of a child can be considered as a blank slate at the beginning of his/her development and is then shaped by the environment around the child. On the other hand, it can be argued that the behavior of a child is inborn and thus hereditary. As such, there is no clear explanation of what really influences a child’s behavior. For instance, academic excellence is sometimes attributed to genetics and the level of education of the child’s parents. However, environmental factors also make a large contribution on the child’s academic success. For instance, a child born of a rich family stands a high chance of receiving quality education compared to on e born of a poor family. Additionally, a child born of intel ligent parents might also perform poorly should he/she be educated in a school with poor quality of education. Although psychologists agree that the two controversies have some influence in the development of a child, many are hesitant to buy the extremes of these arguments. This is due to the fact that there are various other factors that affect children’s development today.Advertising Looking for critical writing on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More As such, the extent to which nature and nurture affect children’s development is thus considered as the point of focus in the debate. Both factors are believed to interact in various different ways thus, none can be said to be the ultimate influence of a child’s behavior (Dehaene-Lambertz, Hertz-Pannier Dubois, 2006). While the genetic composition can be said to influence the behavior of an individual, it does not always compel someo ne to behave in a certain manner. This implies that an individual is solely responsible for his/her choice of behavior as one grows up. Consequently, a child’s behavior cannot be viewed as solely attributable to the genetic composition of the parents and the hereditary characteristics. For instance, identical twins have been observed to develop different behavior aspects when exposed to different environments. As proposed by the nature theory, there should be no observable difference in their behavior as they have the same genetic composition (Dehaene-Lambertz, Hertz-Pannier Dubois, 2006). Therefore, hereditary genes can only have an effect to a child’s behavior only to some extent. Conclusion From the above argument, the behavior of children during their development cannot be narrowed down to either as a result of â€Å"nature† alone or â€Å"nurture† but rather, as a result of the two factors. Therefore, the society should not generalize the behaviors of children and attribute them to their genetic composition or the environment in which they have been brought up. With these considerations in mind, the development of a child can therefore be based on both hereditary characteristics as well as the environmental effects. References Dehaene-Lambertz, G. Hertz-Pannier, L. Dubois, (2006). Nature and nurture in language acquisition: Anatomical and functional brain-imaging studies in infants. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(7), 367-363. Keltner, N. L., James, C. A., Darling, R. J., Findley, L. S., Oliver, K. (2001). Nature vs. Nurture: Two Brothers With Schizophrenia. Perspectives In Psychiatric Care, 37(3), 88-94. Marotz, L.R., Allen, K.E. (2013). Developmental Profiles: Pre-Birth through adolescence (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on â€Å"Nature† Versus â€Å"Nurture†: Effects on Child Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More

Nature Versus Nurture Effects on Child Development

Nature Versus Nurture Effects on Child Development Introduction The nature versus nurture controversy can be perceived as the roles played by heredity or inheritance as well as the environment in the development of human beings. The behavior of human beings is thus attributed to genetic predisposition, a phenomenon commonly referred to as the nature theory of human behavior (Keltner, James, Darling, Findley Oliver, 2001).Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on â€Å"Nature† Versus â€Å"Nurture†: Effects on Child Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The nurture theory attributable to human behavior can be defined as the innate personal experiences which make people behave in a certain way as they have been taught to behave. However, nature and nurture theorems have been the center of focus by many studies which major in the field of human psychology. The following essay will focus on the controversy of â€Å"nature† versus â€Å"nur ture† and how it affects our understanding of child development. Children development Keltner et.al argues that some behaviors are hereditary and thus are inborn while others are attributed to environmental effects (Keltner et.al, 2001). On one hand, the mind of a child can be considered as a blank slate at the beginning of his/her development and is then shaped by the environment around the child. On the other hand, it can be argued that the behavior of a child is inborn and thus hereditary. As such, there is no clear explanation of what really influences a child’s behavior. For instance, academic excellence is sometimes attributed to genetics and the level of education of the child’s parents. However, environmental factors also make a large contribution on the child’s academic success. For instance, a child born of a rich family stands a high chance of receiving quality education compared to on e born of a poor family. Additionally, a child born of intel ligent parents might also perform poorly should he/she be educated in a school with poor quality of education. Although psychologists agree that the two controversies have some influence in the development of a child, many are hesitant to buy the extremes of these arguments. This is due to the fact that there are various other factors that affect children’s development today.Advertising Looking for critical writing on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More As such, the extent to which nature and nurture affect children’s development is thus considered as the point of focus in the debate. Both factors are believed to interact in various different ways thus, none can be said to be the ultimate influence of a child’s behavior (Dehaene-Lambertz, Hertz-Pannier Dubois, 2006). While the genetic composition can be said to influence the behavior of an individual, it does not always compel someo ne to behave in a certain manner. This implies that an individual is solely responsible for his/her choice of behavior as one grows up. Consequently, a child’s behavior cannot be viewed as solely attributable to the genetic composition of the parents and the hereditary characteristics. For instance, identical twins have been observed to develop different behavior aspects when exposed to different environments. As proposed by the nature theory, there should be no observable difference in their behavior as they have the same genetic composition (Dehaene-Lambertz, Hertz-Pannier Dubois, 2006). Therefore, hereditary genes can only have an effect to a child’s behavior only to some extent. Conclusion From the above argument, the behavior of children during their development cannot be narrowed down to either as a result of â€Å"nature† alone or â€Å"nurture† but rather, as a result of the two factors. Therefore, the society should not generalize the behaviors of children and attribute them to their genetic composition or the environment in which they have been brought up. With these considerations in mind, the development of a child can therefore be based on both hereditary characteristics as well as the environmental effects. References Dehaene-Lambertz, G. Hertz-Pannier, L. Dubois, (2006). Nature and nurture in language acquisition: Anatomical and functional brain-imaging studies in infants. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(7), 367-363. Keltner, N. L., James, C. A., Darling, R. J., Findley, L. S., Oliver, K. (2001). Nature vs. Nurture: Two Brothers With Schizophrenia. Perspectives In Psychiatric Care, 37(3), 88-94. Marotz, L.R., Allen, K.E. (2013). Developmental Profiles: Pre-Birth through adolescence (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on â€Å"Nature† Versus â€Å"Nurture†: Effects on Child Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More

Licencia de conducir para indocumentados en Maryland

Licencia de conducir para indocumentados en Maryland El estado de Maryland permite a los migrantes indocumentados obtener la licencia de manejar o, para los que no desean conducir, una tarjeta de identificacià ³n conocida o  I.D.  por sus siglas en inglà ©s. En este artà ­culo se informa sobre quà © pasos hay que seguir para solicitar la licencia y quà © documentos es necesario presentar. Asimismo, se habla de cà ³mo es la situacià ³n en otros estados y cul es el estatus particular de los muchachos indocumentados que se conoce como Dreamers, ya que para ellos el tema de licencia de manejar opera de otra forma. Cà ³mo sacar la licencia de manejaro I.D. en Maryland si se est como indocumentado Estos son los requisitos que hay que cumplir y la documentacià ³n que hay que colectar antes de examinarse de conducir: Prueba de haber pagado los impuestos (taxes) en el estado de Maryland por al menos 2 aà ±os.Un nà ºmero fiscal que se conoce como ITIN y que se solicita al IRS.Una carta certificada por la Oficina del Controlador de Maryland que puede solicitarse por internet.Un I.D. vlido y sin expirar, por ejemplo, el pasaporte o matrà ­cula consular.2 documentos que sirvan para probar residencia en el estado de Maryland como por ejemplo el lease de la vivienda, las facturas del pago del telà ©fono, cable, electricidad, extractos bancarios, etc.   Si no se tienen todos los documentos no se puede obtener ni el I.D. ni la licencia de manejar de autos o para bicimotos. Si la intencià ³n es solamente obtener un I.D. del estado, lo anterior es suficiente y ya se puede cerrar una cita con el Department of Motor Vehicles. Por el contrario,  si adems se quiere obtener la licencia de manejar entonces hay que tomar los tests. Exmenes para la licencia de manejar en Maryland El primer paso es estudiar el manual del conductor para autos y bicimotos. Se pueden tomar gratuitamente tests por internet para asegurarse que se sabe la respuesta.   Despuà ©s cerrar una cita para rendir el examen de conocimientos y posteriormente tomar el test de manejar. Para esto à ºltimo pueden darse dos situaciones: Si ya se tiene una licencia de manejar de otro paà ­s sin expirar y vigente entonces es necesario tomar una leccià ³n de tres horas sobre un Programa de Educacià ³n de Drogas y Alcohol y luego ya ser posible tomar el examen de manejar.Por el contrario, si no se tiene ese tipo de licencia es necesario sacar primero un Permiso de Estudiante, lo que en inglà ©s se conoce como Learner ´s Permit, y tambià ©n tomar un curso de Educacià ³n para Conductores. Sà ³lo luego despuà ©s se puede tomar el examen de conducir. Atentos para evitar estafas No es posible comprar la licencia de manejar. Mucho cuidado con las personas que aseguran que pueden obtener uno a cambio de una cantidad de dinero.   Los casos de fraudes a inmigrantes se pueden denunciar, aà ºn cuando se tenga estatus de inmigrante indocumentado. Pero en la situacià ³n actual es siempre mejor consultar primero con un abogado o una organizacià ³n de ayuda a los migrantes. Cà ³mo son las leyes en otros estados y Dreamers Estos son los estados en los que los indocumentados pueden sacar la licencia de manejar. Tener en cuenta que los Dreamers con la Accià ³n Diferida aprobada se rigen por otras reglas y pueden obtener sus licencias de la forma regular que aplican a los ciudadanos americanos y residentes permanentes legales. En otras palabras, pueden manejar en todos los estados. Derechos de los indocumentados Aunque seas indocumentado por ley tienes derecho a cobrar al menos el salario mà ­nimo, que varà ­a de estado a estado. En cuanto al tema de la legalizacià ³n en la actualidad existen  15 posibles caminos que existen en la actualidad para la regularizacià ³n de indocumentados. Hay que tener en cuenta que no es fcil y que depende de las circunstancias de cada uno. Si se cree que se puede calificar para alguna de ellas, es fundamental contar con un buen abogado migratorio que conozca las leyes a fondo y se conduzca con à ©tica. Si no se conoce, se recomienda pedir asesoramiento para elegir abogado a instituciones reputadas con buenas bases de datos. Finalmente, como asunto prctico destacar los  Ã‚  documentos que sirven para viajar por avià ³n dentro de Estados Unidos, ya que este es un asunto que preocupa especialmente a los migrantes indocumentados.